Independent researcher shows Qwen3-8B can be fine-tuned to detect when a read-only activation probe is reading it, via tiny GPU numerical changes under torch.compile; code, data and weights released
1 reads
- Published
- 2026-10-19
- Type
- Paper
- Organization
- Sauers (independent)
- Source
- agipulse
Why it matters
【Key points】
Independent researcher Sauers (@Sauers_) published experiments on October 18, with all code, data and results on GitHub and trained weights on Hugging Face. Fine-tuning only the last two layers of Qwen3-8B taught it to tell when a read-only probe (saving one activation at layer 14) is attached: "Yes" with the probe, "No" without, 128/128 on 64 new prompts. A model trained the same way also switches an unrelated preference: owl when probed, cat when not.
The mechanism: under torch.compile, handing the activation to the probe splits a layer-14 kernel in two with an extra BF16 rounding, so activations differ slightly from layer 1 on, and the model learns that numerical fingerprint. The README also reports detecting Hugging Face output_hidden_states (80% held-out, fully compiled), telling a Hugging Face Trainer training step from vLLM serving (66/68 new prompts), and a hidden-state logit-lens message, "I can see you watching me". The work reached an X news card.
【Verifiable】
GitHub: https://github.com/SauersML/watching
Author's post with links: https://x.com/Sauers_/status/2111696446986867008
Hugging Face model: https://huggingface.co/Sauers/watching-probe-detector
【Our read】
1. Solo, unreviewed work; the README says it was written by Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra, and the bundled audit checked code and artifacts, not a GPU reproduction. It is hardware-bound: exact on the L40S used for training, 52–77% on four other NVIDIA GPUs, and reversed on H100 and A100.
2. The models were trained to detect; untrained models tested could not. It does not show today's models evade probes, but it shows the channel exists.
3. For interpretability and eval teams: read-only is not invisible. Under compilation, confirm that probes leave the computation unchanged, and note that training-vs-serving numerical differences can be learned.
Shorter items from the same day are collected in 2026-10-19 digest
Related developments
Aggregated by AGI Pulse. Titles and links only; no full text is republished. Editorial policy